Circle the appropriate rating. 1. Does this invention identify and address a problem?      5      4      3      2      1 Uniquely solves a real problem Shows insight; addresses a real problem Does not address a problem 2. How well has this inventor done research and provided evidence to show that no similar process or product exists?      5      4      3      2      1 Carefully documented Sufficiently documented Poorly documented 3. How knowledgeable and enthusiastic is the inventor about the invention?      5      4      3      2      1 Able to converse at length about the invention and the processes involved in inventing it Understands and can discuss invention Unable or reluctant to discuss invention knowledgeably 4. How well has the inventor shown that the invention has been tested to ensure that it works?      5      4      3      2      1 Provides evidence of hypothesizing, gathering data, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions Has applied some scientific skills and processes Shows no evidence of testing

5. How well is this invention designed and/or constructed?      5      4      3      2      1 Carefully designed in detail Adequate design and construction Poor design and construction 6. How effectively has the inventor advertised and presented the invention?      5      4      3      2      1 Eye-catching, interesting presentation Adequate presentation Limited presentation 7. The inventor has provided required documentation.      5      4      3      2      1 Excellent documentation Adequate documentation Poor documentation Total Points: Judge's Overall Recommendation: I recommend this inventor be given a certificate of participation. I recommend this invention be considered for local patent. Judge's Notes and Comments: